+1 Never assume that something doesn’t matter. It all depends on what the numbers say. The selector and other fields are features that can potentially be used to predict malicious or spammy behavior. I’m not aware of such a pattern yet for selectors, but it may very well be that there will be a set of best practices for selectors in the future, based on what we observe the bad guys do, as domain reputation becomes more prevalent.
./don > On Oct 11, 2017, at 11:06, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > On 11 Oct 2017, at 6:31, John Stephenson wrote: > > FWIW, maybe 5 years ago, we were required to send a legally mandated bulk > email (deserving of delivery) and when reaching out to various inbox > providers, my contact at yahoo suggested that I send this effort through an > existing domain, but a unique selector. They didn't indicate exactly what > this would do, but it does indicate that they are making use of the > selector beyond it's original intended use, as Benjamin notes above. > > To stress that, on this day and age, it's naïve to think that anything put on > an email, header or body, doesn't matter. > > Best regards > > -lem > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
