On 1/22/21 06:38, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:

But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat expected to receive 
problematic content to a service that tries to keep
such content out of their users' mailboxes doesn't really look very 
professional, and even if it isn't technically
Sendgrid who perform the filtering this approach has the effect of putting a 
content filter on the abuse mailbox.

You're assuming that Sendgrid actually cares about or reads abuse complaints in the first place. The spam is a steady flow, nothing new. In Sendgrid's case, filtering abuse complaints through Google may well be by design. They just as well could have used Mailinator considering the amount of attention they give complaints of abuse.

--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to