mailop  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [mailop] Manitu listing the world? Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Manitu listing the world? lukn via mailop
• [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target mailop--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Benny Pedersen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Peter Corlett via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Dave Crocker via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Dan Malm via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Kai 'wusel' Siering via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Julian Bradfield via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target Lena--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] PEST - Proxy Email Spam Target John Levine via mailop
• [mailop] Proofpoint NDRs Simon Burke via mailop
• [mailop] Arcor.de contact? Anna Kotlikov via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Arcor.de contact? Gellner, Oliver via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Arcor.de contact? Anna Kotlikov via mailop
• [mailop] Who would be handling how Microsoft emails their Sign-In notifications? Michael Peddemors via mailop
• [mailop] simple SPF/DKIM question postfix--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] simple SPF/DKIM question Mark Alley via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] simple SPF/DKIM question Daniel K. via mailop
• [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage Graeme Fowler via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage Mark E. Mallett via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage Michael Irvine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage Bjoern Franke via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage Graeme Fowler via mailop
• [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Rob McEwen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Alex Burch via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Jerry Cloe via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Rob McEwen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Dave Dewey via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Chris Vitulski via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] AT&T/Prodogy/Yahoo claims that my sending IP doesn't have rDNS, except it does! Robert L Mathews via mailop
• Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Robert Giles via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Atro Tossavainen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Robert Giles via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Thomas Walter via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Aban Dokht via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Human contact at Office365? Michael Rathbun via mailop
• [mailop] Paging AT&T -- possible DNS resolving error on your end Chris Borgia via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Paging AT&T -- possible DNS resolving error on your end Atro Tossavainen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Paging AT&T -- possible DNS resolving error on your end BRAD JOHNSON via mailop
• [mailop] Contact to Tesco? Sidsel Jensen via mailop
• [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Mark Delany via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Mark Delany via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SMTP Submission issues with latest macOS Mail.app Grant Taylor via mailop
• [mailop] Threads unsubscribes broken Brett Schenker via mailop
• [mailop] Microsoft relaying Spam via Ironport Benoît Panizzon via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Microsoft relaying Spam via Ironport Faisal Misle via mailop
• [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Mike Hammett via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Bjoern Franke via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Al Iverson via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Bill Cole via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Richard Laager via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Gellner, Oliver via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Understanding MX Preference Mike Hammett via mailop
• [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Niels Kobschätzki via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Louis via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Sabahattin Gucukoglu via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Question about SRS and ARC Niels Kobschätzki via mailop
• [mailop] question for CenturyLink Jonathan Leist via mailop
• [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Geert Hendrickx via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format Ralph Seichter via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] DMARC reports in ZIP format John Levine via mailop
• [mailop] Cloudmark block Guillaume Taurel via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Cloudmark block Hello Maildrop via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Cloudmark block Yves-Marie LE PORS-CHAUVEL via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Cloudmark block James Hoddinott via mailop
• [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Chris Spencer via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Kirk MacDonald via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Michael Peddemors via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Chris Spencer via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Michael Brown via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Andreas S. Kerber via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Michael Brown via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Chris Spencer via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Chris Spencer via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] M365 SPF Validation issue where "exists" mechanism is used Chris Spencer via mailop
• [mailop] Why do Microsoft MTA's still list openspf.net in diagnostic messages? Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Why do Microsoft MTA's still list openspf.net in diagnostic messages? Michael Orlitzky via mailop
• [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Tapio Peltonen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Kirill Miazine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS L. Mark Stone via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Atro Tossavainen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Tapio Peltonen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Renaud Allard via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Michael Grimm via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Renaud Allard via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Philipp Kern via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Christof Meerwald via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Slavko via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Al Iverson via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Tapio Peltonen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Grant Taylor via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Grant Taylor via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Matthew Stith via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Louis via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Tapio Peltonen via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Spamhaus "free" DQS Tapio Peltonen via mailop
• [mailop] Pyng DNSL configuration for RBL monitoring Kirill Miazine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Pyng DNSL configuration for RBL monitoring Kirill Miazine via mailop
• [mailop] back blowing backscatter Doug via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] back blowing backscatter Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] back blowing backscatter Doug via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] back blowing backscatter Marco Moock via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] back blowing backscatter Grant Taylor via mailop
• [mailop] OpenPGP WKD URL Slavko via mailop
  • [mailop] [ADMIN] OpenPGP WKD URL Graeme Fowler (Admin) via mailop
• [mailop] Icloud contact Pierre Galiegue via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Icloud contact Udeme Ukutt via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Icloud contact Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Icloud contact Chris Borgia via mailop
• [mailop] SPF all mechanism Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SPF all mechanism Cas de Reuver via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SPF all mechanism Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SPF all mechanism Mark Alley via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] SPF all mechanism Gellner, Oliver via mailop
• [mailop] Updating DANE support in exim - was Re: SMTP TLS Reports for forged senders. Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Updating DANE support in exim - was Re: SMTP TLS Reports for forged senders. Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
• [mailop] Reach postmaster at O2Switch Hello Maildrop via mailop
• [mailop] ADMIN: Politics Graeme Fowler (Admin) via mailop
• [mailop] The IETF's mailing lists are moving to a new network John Levine via mailop
• [mailop] How ARC should behaves with 2 Internet Mail Handlers? ismael.tanguy--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] How ARC should behaves with 2 Internet Mail Handlers? Alessandro Vesely via mailop
• [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? ml+mailop--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? @@nosign Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Stuart Henderson via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Graeme Slogrove via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Alessandro Vesely via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Matt Palmer via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Philip Paeps via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Niels Dettenbach via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Philip Paeps via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Sabahattin Gucukoglu via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? Taavi Eomäe via mailop
• [mailop] Microsoft Transport rules breaking DKIM? Erwin Harte via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Microsoft Transport rules breaking DKIM? Louis via mailop
• [mailop] Substack on the list? Lili Crowley via mailop
• [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies Carsten Schiefner via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies ml+mailop--- via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies Bill Cole via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies Bill Cole via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies John Levine via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
  • Re: [mailop] Q re. RFC 5322, sec. 2.3., wrt. completely empty mail bodies SM via mailop
• [mailop] Lot of SPF passing spam lately Tapio Peltonen via mailop

• Earlier messages
• Later messages