>1) Upgrade the redaction document to Proposed Standard, and include in it a 
>note that it is a proposal at this
>point and not a mature protocol, leaving the applicability statement and the 
>authfailure-report documents
>unchanged;

I'd rather do this.  It really does propose a standard way to do something, 
after all.

R's,
John

PS: Yes, it occurred to me that this would be one of the first new PS under the 
new
two-track scheme.
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to