On 1/3/12 4:02 AM, SM wrote:
My preference is to keep the references as they are now and go for the second Last Call with the usual downref disclaimer. draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03 documents a practice.
The redaction document *proposes* a *standard* way of doing redaction. Indeed, the document specifically says that previous practices for redaction cause problems operationally and therefore it *proposes* a better way for everyone to do it. Furthermore, authfailure-report is clearly referring to this practice in a normative way. I am having a hard time understanding how this "documented practice" is not a "proposed standard" and why I should not last call it that way.
pr -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102 _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
