At 21:37 02-01-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
In case there are people not watching the list due to the holidays,
I'll wait a couple of days before moving ahead, but I think
consensus is leaning toward changing the redaction document to
Proposed Standard, and then requesting a second IETF Last Call on
both of them. If those Last Calls are initiated by the end of
Wednesday, they will complete in time for their currently-scheduled
1/19 IESG Evaluations.
My preference is to keep the references as they are now and go for
the second Last Call with the usual downref
disclaimer. draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03 documents a practice.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf