At 21:37 02-01-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
In case there are people not watching the list due to the holidays, I'll wait a couple of days before moving ahead, but I think consensus is leaning toward changing the redaction document to Proposed Standard, and then requesting a second IETF Last Call on both of them. If those Last Calls are initiated by the end of Wednesday, they will complete in time for their currently-scheduled 1/19 IESG Evaluations.

My preference is to keep the references as they are now and go for the second Last Call with the usual downref disclaimer. draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03 documents a practice.

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to