Hi Pete,
At 08:09 03-01-2012, Pete Resnick wrote:
The redaction document *proposes* a *standard* way of doing
redaction. Indeed, the document specifically says that previous
practices for redaction cause problems operationally and therefore
it *proposes* a better way for everyone to do it.
Based on the above argument, draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03 fits within
"proposed standard".
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf