I do translation for LO and AOO as well. In LO, there is no mailing list
like this. I contact a single person to do my translations.

With Warm Regards

V.Kadal Amutham
919444360480
914422396480


On 7 June 2013 04:03, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think we are looking for public shaming of others.
> I think we are looking for 1. recognition and 2. mutual benefits, from what
> is being mentioned previously in this thread.
>
> Lets assume conspiracy theory and everyone who isn't us is evil and that
> they are not contributing bug fixes they find in our code.
> They would be pulling code bugs from us that they already fixed but
> manually would have to override every time we make a release with new
> fixes.
>
> That doesn't sound reasonable, neither the first part about conspiracy nor
> the manual code fixing part.
>
> I would ask the dev list and see if anyone from AOO dev has built
> relationships with LO dev.
> If so what is the general mood and understanding of the relationship
> between the organizations? Friendly, untrustworthy, optimists, fake,
> mutual, one way.
> Is it that they need our help, or we need theirs?  Is it because we can't
> seem to get over the fact we work for different organizations and we have a
> different name?  Our goals seem generally aligned.
>
> I wouldn't assume they are malicious, but again I haven't been around AOO
> very long and also not involved with LO.
> I live thinking most people are not malicious and out to get or use me.
> At the same time I don't do anything I don't want to do, applies to anyone.
>
> Samer
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think we should clearly frame a policy statement w.r.t code reuse by
> > others, and AOO taking code from other sources, put in the website for
> all
> > to know.
> >
> > With Warm Regards
> >
> > V.Kadal Amutham
> > 919444360480
> > 914422396480
> >
> >
> > On 6 June 2013 20:24, Louis Suárez-Potts <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 2013-06-06, at 16:38 , Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This reminds me of a movie of Jackie Chan. I think the name of the
> > movie
> > > is
> > > > "Police Story". The movie comes to an end. Afterwards there was a
> short
> > > > film. A small boy was very hungry. His father steals a loaf of bread
> > > from a
> > > > bakery to feed his son. The police arrives at that time and kills the
> > > > father. Then Jackie Chan comes and consoles the boy, "This world is
> > very
> > > > bad. But we should live in righteous way"
> > >
> > > Your point is somewhat complicated by the fact that Jackie Chan has
> done
> > > tremendous work to remove the triads from informing the HK movie and
> > > Cantopop scene. And he's also recently gotten into some trouble for his
> > > efforts. (Just Google "jackie chan triads".) It's been a long fight of
> > his.
> > > But when he made Police Story A (I think it's the one you refer to, the
> > > homage to Buster Keaton; this was back in the 80s), the triads were
> > > profoundly dominant and determined not just what got made but who made
> it
> > > and for how much. Their control made (or makes) the studio regime in
> > > Hollywood (which ended mid-20th cent., more or less) pale by
> comparison.
> > > (Bollywood does not have anything like this, either, I believe.) As a
> > > result of the triads' control, actors like Chan (but one could also
> name
> > > many, many others) would make far more films each year than their
> > Hollywood
> > > compeers and for far less--and under far, far worse circumstances. (The
> > > film, Painted Faces, ostensibly about Samo Hung's and Chan's early
> > > training, I recall, could also be read as about the film industry in
> HK.
> > > But it's been years since I studied this, so my data are doubtless
> > rusty.)
> > >
> > > I don't think that we actually have an answer to the problematic that's
> > > been pointed out except the one I suggested: simply inform the world of
> > > what is actually going on. Right now, the world, which is to say that
> > > segment fed by the tech writers and who read self-serving blogs,
> believe
> > > that LO is the acme of originality and community and that AOO is the
> > spawn
> > > of something else.
> > >
> > > License allows for many things; that's its point. But being honest
> about
> > > one's doings and acknowledging debt is also very important in the
> > > construction of community.
> > >
> > > louis
> > > >
> > > > With Warm Regards
> > > >
> > > > V.Kadal Amutham
> > > > 919444360480
> > > > 914422396480
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6 June 2013 19:54, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts <
> [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2013-06-06, at 02:23 , Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Thanks Andrea for the response. In general how our community feels
> > > about
> > > >>>> this process?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is the nature of open source. Equally, as Andrea points out
> and
> > as
> > > >> I think most would agree, what is crucial is acknowledging the
> > debt--and
> > > >> then also to pay it back by contributing *back* to OpenOffice.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, the issue is not that Libre Office or any other derivative uses
> > > >> Apache OpenOffice code, the issue is rather whether they contribute
> > > back to
> > > >> the project to which they are indebted.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> And that is the great irony, or hypocrisy even.  If you recall, LO
> > > >> touted the GPL as necessary to ensure that companies would share
> their
> > > >> code, and argued that adherence to a copyleft license was necessary
> to
> > > >> force corporations to behave.  But now we see the main LO sponsors
> --
> > > >> Redhat and Suse --  taking code, but refusing to share or cooperate.
> > > >> Their problem is they've formed a self-interested leadership group
> > > >> that benefits financially from the continued existence of LO.  So
> > > >> anything that would end the fork would end their self-assigned
> > > >> privileges.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Rob
> > > >>
> > > >>> And the larger campaign is then to inform the tech press of the
> > > >> imbalance, if that is what it is. For right now, it seems that the
> > tech
> > > >> press wrongly believes that Libre Office is in the vanguard and that
> > > >> OpenOffice is limping along, in arrears.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> louis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> With Warm Regards
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> V.Kadal Amutham
> > > >>>> 919444360480
> > > >>>> 914422396480
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 6 June 2013 00:54, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On 05/06/2013 Kadal Amutham wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> In one of the threads, there was a discussion regarding source
> > code
> > > >> of AOO
> > > >>>>>> being used by LibreOffice. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This is correct and well known (well, maybe not as widely known
> as
> > it
> > > >>>>> should be). Code from all version of Apache OpenOffice has been
> > > reused.
> > > >>>>> Notable examples include Armin's SVG import and Andre's Sidebar
> > work.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> If this happens this shall be considered as a credit by AOO
> > > community.
> > > >> We
> > > >>>>>> shall feel happy to share our code in full or in part. What we
> can
> > > >> expect
> > > >>>>>> in return is mention of contribution of code by AOO community.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It is acknowledged most of the times, even though it is not done
> > very
> > > >>>>> prominently and at times individual contributors are credited
> > instead
> > > >> of
> > > >>>>> the Apache OpenOffice project (which would probably be clearer).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>> Andrea.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@**
> > > openoffice.apache.org<
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.**
> > > >> apache.org<[email protected]>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [email protected]
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to