******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
With Clinton as president, we're certain to get more war, in the tradition of the last 25 years. With Trump as president, we might not. How can that be a difficult choice? “The CIA has demanded Trump is not elected. Pentagon generals have demanded he is not elected. The pro-war New York Times - taking a breather from its relentless low-rent Putin smears - demands that he is not elected. Something is up. These tribunes of 'perpetual war' are terrified that the multi-billion-dollar business of war by which the United States maintains its dominance will be undermined if Trump does a deal with Putin, then with China's Xi Jinping. Their panic at the possibility of the world's great power talking peace - however unlikely - would be the blackest farce were the issues not so dire.” [John Pilger] —CGE > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Mark Lause via Marxism > <marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote: > > Trump is farther right than the usual Republican. Clinton is way further > right than the usual Democrat. But why waste time dickering over the > calipers. > > If Jill Stein wasn't there, I would still vote against both of them. Maybe > I'd even vote for for the Skippy McTrotly on the Vegetarian Bolshevik > Alliance. > > But not voting at all is better than using your ballot to sanction the next > temporary monarch of the U.S. > _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
