I agree with Mark that Stalin-Trotsky debatte is a distinct debate from the
debate on the historical role of the Soviet Union before, during and after
the WW II. But these two debates can hardly be separated and do not think it
is settled at all as we just start thinking about the issues involved from a
historcial distance.

On the question where to debate these issues: I do not think to transfer the
debate to another, yet to be established list. But one can set limitation to
the postion of people involved, say, two or  three a day or something like
that. Debates are real debates if they involve 'public'.
------
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris,
London&New York 2007
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to