Dogan Gocmen<[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Mark that Stalin-Trotsky debatte is a distinct debate from the > debate on the historical role of the Soviet Union before, during and after > the WW II. >
Actually, I don't particularly care about either. What I said concerned me was the process of how we determine historical realities...because those are relevant to how we measure things today...in the here and now. A discussion of the historic role of the USSR probably belongs on a list of people interested in the history of those events...and it isn't that different than the Stalin-Trotsky debate. I, for one, don't have the time for it. ML ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
