"On the question where to debate these issues: I do not think to transfer the debate to another, yet to be established list. But one can set limitation to the postion of people involved, say, two or three a day or something like that. Debates are real debates if they involve 'public'."
The above should have been: On the question where to debate these issues: I do not think it is a good idea to transfer the debate to another, yet to be established list. But one can set limitation to the posting of people involved, say, two or three a day or something like that. Debates are real debates if they involve 'public'. 2009/8/13 Dogan Gocmen <[email protected]> > I agree with Mark that Stalin-Trotsky debatte is a distinct debate from the > debate on the historical role of the Soviet Union before, during and after > the WW II. But these two debates can hardly be separated and do not think it > is settled at all as we just start thinking about the issues involved from a > historcial distance. > > On the question where to debate these issues: I do not think to transfer > the debate to another, yet to be established list. But one can set > limitation to the postion of people involved, say, two or three a day or > something like that. Debates are real debates if they involve 'public'. > ------ > Dogan Göcmen > (http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/) > Author of The Adam Smith Problem: > Reconciling Human Nature and Society in > The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris, > London&New York 2007 > -- Dogan Göcmen (http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/) Author of The Adam Smith Problem: Reconciling Human Nature and Society in The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris, London&New York 2007 ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
