From: "Les Schaffer" <[email protected]>

> Ian Pace wrote:
>> I'm very glad the suspensions have been lifted. On the wider issues, I 
>> can't
>> really see how a Marxism discussion group could feasibly avoid all
>> discussion of the Soviet Union, but do understand that measures need to 
>> be
>> taken to avoid Trotskyist/Stalinist flame wars.
>
> who gives a shit about this stuff? my grandfather fought these fights
> and he's long since dead and gone 40+ years ago. i have yet to see any
> poster make this stuff relevant to the living, except for the excitation
> it seems to give certain living brains...
>
I give a shit. Soviet communism remains the most prominent historical 
upheaval carried out in Marx's name (which is not the same thing as saying 
it was true to some or all of Marx's ideas). In the 40+ years since your 
grandfather died, and especially in the last 20 years, there has been a mass 
of new information available (through opening of archives) on many aspects 
of the Soviet Union, which has been taken up by historians of all types of 
political persuasion. Some of the scholarship is good, some not (and that 
does not necessarily simply mirror the politics of the historians - Engels 
would have understood that); some of it provides us with a much clearer 
picture of many aspects of life in the Soviet Union, as well as the actions, 
motivations, policies of those at the top. To say there is nothing that 
Marxists of today can learn from this, or that what transpired under those 
circumstances is irrelevant to the future as envisaged by international 
socialists, is extremely foolish. Merely maintaining and reiterating old 
dogmas and reified interpretations is hardly in the spirit of dialectical 
engagement.

Solidarity,
Ian 


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to