Marv denies that "its state enterprises [were] broken up and their assets redistributed as the private property of the various CP nomenklaturas and their cronies and their heirs." Actually, a huge swath were privatized this way in the 1990s. And it is relevant here, in what was still a largely farming country in the early 1980s, that the people's communes were broken up. Nor would it surprise an accurate observer and thinker that the turn to capitalism in the Soviet Union, coming after the country was largely industrialized, differed in form from how the PRC turned to capitalism when only the foundations of industrialization were in place.
Marv says I challenged him to "show how the PRC was different than the single party fascist states." No, I did not. Rather, in the previous thread to which he alludes, I showed that his definition of fascism was so faulty that it lumped them all together. Without ad hominem, with measured language, Marv has again distorted the question. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#29471): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/29471 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104961025/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
