On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Jehan wrote: > personally I would agree. All my searches let me think that there is few > chance that we won't find this on most systems. But as I am not an > expert and knows only the GNU systems (for them I think we will always > find langinfo.h) and that I saw that this variable HAVE_NL_LANGINFO was > already in one place (around the include) and also in urxvt, I thought I > should keep it. > > But if you confirm this should be removed, I will then make langinfo.h > a mandatory include, remove the wrong code and clean everything as a > consequence.
I don't think it will be a mandatory include. It should not be needed unless we're using multichar right? (So some #ifdef HAVE_MULTICHAR or something)? Maybe you can leave it #ifdef'ed for now, and in a few months we can remove all the outdated stuff completely. GI -- 'Committee' -- A cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Materm-devel mailing list Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net
