Dear Fiaz Ahmad,

Okay thank you, so what's your recommendation for this power system
analysis method?
*Best Regards,*

*Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*

Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
Electrical Engineering Department
Faculty of Electrical Technology
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Surabaya, Indonesia

+62 8170 3178 248



On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 01:04, Fiaz Ahmad <[email protected]> wrote:

> Normally Newton Raphson method doesn't converge for distribution systems
> due to high r/x ratios
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 22:48 Carlos A. Castro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Nitya
>>
>> I would do two things:
>>
>> 1. I would replace all commas "," by points "." in the data file.
>>
>> 2. I would try to draw the one line diagram of the network based on the
>> data, to check whether the network is all connected, that is, that there
>> are no isolated buses or group of buses,
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 14:42, Nitya Kirana <[email protected]>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I have run the power flow of 64 radial test bus system using Newton
>>> Raphson in Matpower 4.1. It shows the result of power losses but it
>>> doesn't converge, whenever I run the matlab, the result is always
>>> different, and I don't know what's the problem. Can anyone help me? because
>>> this is my final project. It shows "Warning: Matrix is singular to
>>> working precision."
>>>
>>> So, here is my data :
>>>
>>> bus data
>>>          bus               type    Pd          Qd               Gs Bs
>>> area Vm            Va baseKV zone        Vmax          Vmin
>>> 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 4 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 5 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 7 1 0,07684 0,091846 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 8 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 9 1 0,03808 0,045517 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 10 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 11 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 12 1 0,017 0,02032 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 13 1 0,022304 0,02666 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 14 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 15 1 0,05848 0,069901 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 16 1 0,26384 0,315366 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 17 1 0,03774 0,04511 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 18 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 19 1 0,05576 0,06665 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 20 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 21 1 0,0306 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 22 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 23 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 24 1 0,11764 0,140614 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 25 1 0,0068 0,008128 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 26 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 27 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 28 1 0,112948 0,135006 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 29 1 0,02176 0,02601 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 31 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 32 1 0,05168 0,061773 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 33 1 0,03468 0,041453 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 34 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 35 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>> 36 1 0,01768 0,021133</fon
>>>
>>

Reply via email to