Dear Nitya use forward-backward sweep algorithm for the power flow of this
system.


Have a nice day

Regards,
DR. FIAZ AHMAD
PhD Mechatronics Engineering (Sabanci University, Istanbul Turkey),
Mob: 0092-332-9124525,






On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:51 AM Nitya Kirana <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Fiaz Ahmad,
>
> Okay thank you, so what's your recommendation for this power system
> analysis method?
> *Best Regards,*
>
> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>
> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
> Electrical Engineering Department
> Faculty of Electrical Technology
> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
> Surabaya, Indonesia
>
> +62 8170 3178 248
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 01:04, Fiaz Ahmad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Normally Newton Raphson method doesn't converge for distribution systems
>> due to high r/x ratios
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 22:48 Carlos A. Castro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Nitya
>>>
>>> I would do two things:
>>>
>>> 1. I would replace all commas "," by points "." in the data file.
>>>
>>> 2. I would try to draw the one line diagram of the network based on the
>>> data, to check whether the network is all connected, that is, that there
>>> are no isolated buses or group of buses,
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 14:42, Nitya Kirana <
>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I have run the power flow of 64 radial test bus system using Newton
>>>> Raphson in Matpower 4.1. It shows the result of power losses but it
>>>> doesn't converge, whenever I run the matlab, the result is always
>>>> different, and I don't know what's the problem. Can anyone help me? because
>>>> this is my final project. It shows "Warning: Matrix is singular to
>>>> working precision."
>>>>
>>>> So, here is my data :
>>>>
>>>> bus data
>>>>          bus               type    Pd          Qd               Gs Bs
>>>> area Vm            Va baseKV zone        Vmax          Vmin
>>>> 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 4 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 5 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 7 1 0,07684 0,091846 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 8 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 9 1 0,03808 0,045517 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 10 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 11 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 12 1 0,017 0,02032 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 13 1 0,022304 0,02666 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 14 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 15 1 0,05848 0,069901 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 16 1 0,26384 0,315366 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 17 1 0,03774 0,04511 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 18 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 19 1 0,05576 0,06665 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 20 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 21 1 0,0306 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 22 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 23 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 24 1 0,11764 0,140614 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 25 1 0,0068 0,008128 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 26 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 27 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 28 1 0,112948 0,135006 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 29 1 0,02176 0,02601 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 31 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 32 1 0,05168 0,061773 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 33 1 0,03468 0,041453 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 34 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 35 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>> 36 1 0,01768 0,021133</fon
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to