Dear Ray Zimmerman,

Thank you before for your answer,

I have tried to write

if sum(sum(matran))==0
                 result=runpf(hop);

 fitness(k)=sum(result.branch(:,14)+result.branch(:,16))*1e3;
             end
         end
         if ~result.success
    keyboard;
         end


but It didn't drop me into Matlab Debugger, or did I write it wrong? The
problem is my program works but the result is different for every run.

*Best Regards,*

*Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*

Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
Electrical Engineering Department
Faculty of Electrical Technology
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Surabaya, Indonesia

+62 8170 3178 248



On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 22:58, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I ran your code on my machine using the latest MATPOWER development
> version (available on GitHub <https://github.com/MATPOWER/matpower/>). It
> ran to the end with the following result …
>
>
> ==========================================================================================
> ******************** SIMULATION RESULTS OF 64 BUS DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
> *******************
>
> ==========================================================================================
>                        BEFORE RECONFIGURATION              AFTER
> RECONFIGURATION
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tie switches:              62  63  64  65  66
>   3   4  14  19  23
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Power loss:                28.6627 kW                         NaN kW
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Power loss reduction:      _______                             NaN %
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Minimum voltage:           0.97552 pu                          0.95288 pu
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> However, it does appear that some of the power flows did not converge. I
> checked the first two instances and found that in both cases the network
> was not fully connected. In case you’re interested in how I did it, I
> inserted the following lines right after the call to runpf.
>
> if ~result.success
>     keyboard;
> end
>
> This drops me into the Matlab debugger if the power flow fails to
> converge. Then I just use case_info()
> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/ref/matpower6.0/case_info.html> to
> check the connectivity of that particular case …
>
> case_info(hop1)
>
> Give it a try and you should see what I mean. And I recommend using
> MATPOWER 7.0b1 or at the very least 6.0.
>
>     Ray
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2019, at 9:07 AM, Nitya Kirana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Ilias Sarantakos,
>
> I didn't find Matpower 6.1 and I downloaded the 6.0 version instead. When
> I run the program, it still doesn't converge. I don't know if the problem
> is in my SPSO or in my Newton Raphson Method. Here I attach my coding, can
> you run it for me? Thank you. I really need  help for my final project.
>
> Notes : The program you have to run is in main64.
>
> *Best Regards,*
>
> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>
> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
> Electrical Engineering Department
> Faculty of Electrical Technology
> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
> Surabaya, Indonesia
>
> +62 8170 3178 248
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:49, Ilias Sarantakos <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nitya,
>>
>> I tried your network and it converged; I am using MATPOWER 6.1.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Ilias Sarantakos
>> PhD Student
>> Newcastle University
>> UK
>>
>> Στις Τρί, 9 Απρ 2019 στις 9:19 π.μ., ο/η Nitya Kirana <
>> [email protected]> έγραψε:
>>
>>> Dear Fiaz Ahmad,
>>>
>>> I actually have run the simulation for IEEE 33 bus, 16 bus, and 69 bus
>>> using Newton Raphson method and the result is convergen. And also in IEEE
>>> 33 bus it has the ratio R/X greater than mine, so I just think that the
>>> problem is not the Newton Raphson method. Anw, thank you for your
>>> recommendation.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Best Regards, *
>>>
>>> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>>>
>>> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
>>> Electrical Engineering Department
>>> Faculty of Electrical Technology
>>> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
>>> Surabaya, Indonesia
>>>
>>> +62 8170 3178 248
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 11:54, Fiaz Ahmad <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Nitya use forward-backward sweep algorithm for the power flow of
>>>> this system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have a nice day
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> DR. FIAZ AHMAD
>>>> PhD Mechatronics Engineering (Sabanci University, Istanbul Turkey),
>>>> Mob: 0092-332-9124525,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:51 AM Nitya Kirana <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Fiaz Ahmad,
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay thank you, so what's your recommendation for this power system
>>>>> analysis method?
>>>>> *Best Regards,*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>>>>>
>>>>> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
>>>>> Electrical Engineering Department
>>>>> Faculty of Electrical Technology
>>>>> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
>>>>> Surabaya, Indonesia
>>>>>
>>>>> +62 8170 3178 248
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 01:04, Fiaz Ahmad <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Normally Newton Raphson method doesn't converge for distribution
>>>>>> systems due to high r/x ratios
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 22:48 Carlos A. Castro <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Nitya
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would do two things:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. I would replace all commas "," by points "." in the data file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. I would try to draw the one line diagram of the network based on
>>>>>>> the data, to check whether the network is all connected, that is, that
>>>>>>> there are no isolated buses or group of buses,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good luck,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 14:42, Nitya Kirana <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have run the power flow of 64 radial test bus system using Newton
>>>>>>>> Raphson in Matpower 4.1. It shows the result of power losses but
>>>>>>>> it doesn't converge, whenever I run the matlab, the result is always
>>>>>>>> different, and I don't know what's the problem. Can anyone help me? 
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>> this is my final project. It shows "Warning: Matrix is singular to
>>>>>>>> working precision."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, here is my data :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bus data
>>>>>>>>          bus               type    Pd          Qd               Gs
>>>>>>>> Bs area Vm            Va baseKV zone        Vmax          Vmin
>>>>>>>> 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 4 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 5 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 7 1 0,07684 0,091846 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 8 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 9 1 0,03808 0,045517 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 10 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 11 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 12 1 0,017 0,02032 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 13 1 0,022304 0,02666 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 14 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 15 1 0,05848 0,069901 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 16 1 0,26384 0,315366 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 17 1 0,03774 0,04511 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 18 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 19 1 0,05576 0,06665 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 20 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 21 1 0,0306 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 22 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 23 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 24 1 0,11764 0,140614 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 25 1 0,0068 0,008128 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 26 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 27 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 28 1 0,112948 0,135006 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 29 1 0,02176 0,02601 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 31 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 32 1 0,05168 0,061773 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 33 1 0,03468 0,041453 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 34 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 35 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>>>> 36 1 0,01768 0,021133</fon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <main64.m><case64.m><bus64.xls><swarm64.m><branch64.xls>
>
>
>

Reply via email to