Thanks Greg. We just came across this: /var/matterhorn/1.2.0/docs/scripts/3rd_party/linux-compile
Can we simply comment out the ffmpeg_libs and ffmpeg lines? What about base_libs? We're guessing NO, but what do you think? --Steven. -- Steven Lichti Academic Technologies Northwestern University [email protected] (847) 467-7805 On 9/6/11 3:26 PM, "Greg Logan" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 11-09-06 02:19 PM, Steven M Lichti wrote: >> Tobias, >> >> I thought I asked this before, but apparently not. Is it possible to >> install Matterhorn and not have it install FFMpeg? We would then use the >> FFMpeg 0.8.2 install that is already present. > >Assuming that the other 3rd party tools are installed you should just be >able to build the jars and run Felix. Just don't build the 3rd party >tools! Building the 3rd party tools without FFMPEG would take some >doing to disable the build of ffmpeg. At least I think so... Matjaz >would be able to tell you more on that front. > >G > >> I don't want to overwrite the 0.8.2 install in the process of installing >> MatterhornŠ >> >> Thanks! >> >> --Steven. >> >> -- >> Steven Lichti >> Academic Technologies >> Northwestern University >> [email protected] >> (847) 467-7805 >> >> >> >> From: Tobias Wunden <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Reply-To: Matterhorn Users <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:19:25 +0200 >> To: Matterhorn Users <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] Running a newer version of ffmpeg >> w/Matterhorn? >> >> Hi Steven, >> >> Rüdiger Rolf updated ffmpeg in the third party installation script in >> trunk to 0.8.2. I gave the updated toolchain a try (changed the options >> that Rüdiger mentioned in his e-mail that need to change (-strict >> inofficial) first) and everything looks good. >> >> So what you want to do is checkout the current trunk version and run the >> third party scripts from /docs/scripts/3rdparty. Adjust the encoding >> profiles (change "inofficial" to "unofficial") and you should be good to >> go. No need to switch Matterhorn itself to trunk. It would be great if >> you could share your experiences on list, possibly including your >> encoding profiles if you find them worth sharing. >> >> Tobias >> >> On 23.08.2011, at 21:28, Steven M Lichti wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We doing some custom workflow work here to add Matterhorn-recorded >>> material to our home-grown media space system. To take advantage of >>> newer capabilities, we're using a newer version of ffmpeg that the one >>> that is shipping with Matterhorn. >>> >>> Is there any reason why the newer version of ffmpeg won't work, or >>> will cause problems? >>> >>> Please let us know your thoughtsŠ >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> --Steven. >> >> _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing >> list [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > >_______________________________________________ >Matterhorn-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
