Rüdiger, To clarify, check out the code from the 1.2.0 tag. Then also check out the trunk code for the 3rd party tools?
Build the 1.2.0 code as a normal deployTo, but add the -DskipTests. Then build the 3rd party trunk tools as well? I think I'm missing a couple of steps here... --Steven. -- Steven Lichti Academic Technologies Northwestern University [email protected] (847) 467-7805 On 9/7/11 6:33 AM, "Steven M Lichti" <[email protected]> wrote: >Rüdiger, > >I'll try that shortly. That makes much more sense. > >Thank you... > >--Steven. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ruediger Rolf [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 02:45 AM >To: Matterhorn Users <[email protected]> >Cc: Steven M Lichti >Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] Running a newer version of ffmpeg >w/Matterhorn? > >Hi Steven, > >I don't understand your current problem. > >You build the 3rd-party-tools from trunk. You downloaded 1.2 and want to >run 1.2? > >1. Don't build the 1.2 3rd-party tools at all. The 3rd-party-tools from >trunk will just works fine if they are already installed. >2. change in $FELIX_HOME/conf/encoding/*.properties all "inofficial" to >"unofficial". >3. Build matterhorn 1.2 with "mvn clean install >-DdeployTo=$FELIX_HOME/matterhorn -DskipTests" > >This way you will run matterhorn 1.2 with ffmpeg 0.8.2. > >Rüdiger > >Am 06.09.2011 22:32, schrieb Steven M Lichti: >> Thanks Greg. We just came across this: >> >> /var/matterhorn/1.2.0/docs/scripts/3rd_party/linux-compile >> >> Can we simply comment out the ffmpeg_libs and ffmpeg lines? What about >> base_libs? >> >> We're guessing NO, but what do you think? >> >> --Steven. >> >> -- >> Steven Lichti >> Academic Technologies >> Northwestern University >> [email protected] >> (847) 467-7805 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 9/6/11 3:26 PM, "Greg Logan"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 11-09-06 02:19 PM, Steven M Lichti wrote: >>>> Tobias, >>>> >>>> I thought I asked this before, but apparently not. Is it possible to >>>> install Matterhorn and not have it install FFMpeg? We would then use >>>>the >>>> FFMpeg 0.8.2 install that is already present. >>> Assuming that the other 3rd party tools are installed you should just >>>be >>> able to build the jars and run Felix. Just don't build the 3rd party >>> tools! Building the 3rd party tools without FFMPEG would take some >>> doing to disable the build of ffmpeg. At least I think so... Matjaz >>> would be able to tell you more on that front. >>> >>> G >>> >>>> I don't want to overwrite the 0.8.2 install in the process of >>>>installing >>>> MatterhornŠ >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> --Steven. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steven Lichti >>>> Academic Technologies >>>> Northwestern University >>>> [email protected] >>>> (847) 467-7805 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Tobias Wunden<[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> Reply-To: Matterhorn Users<[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:19:25 +0200 >>>> To: Matterhorn Users<[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] Running a newer version of ffmpeg >>>> w/Matterhorn? >>>> >>>> Hi Steven, >>>> >>>> Rüdiger Rolf updated ffmpeg in the third party installation script in >>>> trunk to 0.8.2. I gave the updated toolchain a try (changed the >>>>options >>>> that Rüdiger mentioned in his e-mail that need to change (-strict >>>> inofficial) first) and everything looks good. >>>> >>>> So what you want to do is checkout the current trunk version and run >>>>the >>>> third party scripts from /docs/scripts/3rdparty. Adjust the encoding >>>> profiles (change "inofficial" to "unofficial") and you should be good >>>>to >>>> go. No need to switch Matterhorn itself to trunk. It would be great if >>>> you could share your experiences on list, possibly including your >>>> encoding profiles if you find them worth sharing. >>>> >>>> Tobias >>>> >>>> On 23.08.2011, at 21:28, Steven M Lichti wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> We doing some custom workflow work here to add Matterhorn-recorded >>>>> material to our home-grown media space system. To take advantage of >>>>> newer capabilities, we're using a newer version of ffmpeg that the >>>>>one >>>>> that is shipping with Matterhorn. >>>>> >>>>> Is there any reason why the newer version of ffmpeg won't work, or >>>>> will cause problems? >>>>> >>>>> Please let us know your thoughtsŠ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> --Steven. >>>> _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users >>>>mailing >>>> list [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> > > >-- > >________________________________________________ >Rüdiger Rolf, M.A. >Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS >Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück >Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511 >E-Mail: [email protected] >Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de > >_______________________________________________ >Matterhorn-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
