I'm not a committer, and I'm not sure [1] or a related document defines a 
deadline for a "-1", but given the heated discussion we had around the Admin UI 
before and in light of the Easter holiday, I would plead for this proposal to 
wait for committers returning to work Tuesday or Wednesday.

O

[1] http://opencast.org/opencast-governance.

>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: [email protected] [mailto:matterhorn-
>[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 6. April 2012 02:36
>An: Opencast Matterhorn
>Betreff: Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] Minor changes to Admin UI to avoid new
>terminology ("Episodes") #proposal
>
>I'm +0, I think the second design looks better than the first.
>
>Some caveats:
>- once we do tabs in tabs are we sure this is how we want it to scale?
>- re-process should not be hyphenated
>- what does the re-process drop down do (is this a list of workflows?  that's 
>what I
>would have expected to see)
>- I really like the "search" box there, this list is going to be potentially 
>thousands of
>recordings in just a single year
>
>Chris
>
>
>Quoting Judy Stern <[email protected]>:
>
>> Dear Committers:
>> I would like to propose that we make minor changes to the Admin UI in
>> order to make it more understandable to those less-Matterhorn-savvy
>> users (day-to-day program administrators, not system administrators)
>> who do not understand what the term "episodes" means (or how it
>> differs from "recordings"). The minor changes involve moving the
>> episode service functionality from the Episodes tab to a sub-tab under
>> the Recordings tab; this way users will find functionality for all
>> aspects of dealing with recordings (monitoring current activity and
>> reprocessing archives) under one tab. There would no longer be a separate
>Episodes tab.  Here is a sketch:
>>
>http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Keeping+Episodes+UI+Separate+from+Wo
>rkflow+Instances+UI#KeepingEpisodesUISeparatefromWorkflowInstancesUI-
>Approach2
>>
>> Please vote +1 if you agree with this proposed change, or -1 if you disagree.
>> If you disagree, it would be helpful if you could explain why you
>> believe it would detract from the UI or otherwise be harmful. (Note:
>> While I am not able to make these changes at present, Rüdiger has
>> indicated that he would consider assigning the ticket that addresses
>> this issue, MH-8695, to someone on his team, if this is
>> non-controversial.)
>>
>> best regards,
>> Judy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Matterhorn mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
>To unsubscribe please email
>[email protected]
>_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to