I agree, +1 to keeping this discussion open until the end of day Wednesday the 11th.
Chris Quoting "Schulte Olaf A." <[email protected]>: > I'm not a committer, and I'm not sure [1] or a related document defines a > deadline for a "-1", but given the heated discussion we had around the Admin > UI before and in light of the Easter holiday, I would plead for this proposal > to wait for committers returning to work Tuesday or Wednesday. > > O > > [1] http://opencast.org/opencast-governance. > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >Von: [email protected] [mailto:matterhorn- > >[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] > >Gesendet: Freitag, 6. April 2012 02:36 > >An: Opencast Matterhorn > >Betreff: Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] Minor changes to Admin UI to avoid new > >terminology ("Episodes") #proposal > > > >I'm +0, I think the second design looks better than the first. > > > >Some caveats: > >- once we do tabs in tabs are we sure this is how we want it to scale? > >- re-process should not be hyphenated > >- what does the re-process drop down do (is this a list of workflows? > that's what I > >would have expected to see) > >- I really like the "search" box there, this list is going to be potentially > thousands of > >recordings in just a single year > > > >Chris > > > > > >Quoting Judy Stern <[email protected]>: > > > >> Dear Committers: > >> I would like to propose that we make minor changes to the Admin UI in > >> order to make it more understandable to those less-Matterhorn-savvy > >> users (day-to-day program administrators, not system administrators) > >> who do not understand what the term "episodes" means (or how it > >> differs from "recordings"). The minor changes involve moving the > >> episode service functionality from the Episodes tab to a sub-tab under > >> the Recordings tab; this way users will find functionality for all > >> aspects of dealing with recordings (monitoring current activity and > >> reprocessing archives) under one tab. There would no longer be a separate > >Episodes tab. Here is a sketch: > >> > >http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Keeping+Episodes+UI+Separate+from+Wo > >rkflow+Instances+UI#KeepingEpisodesUISeparatefromWorkflowInstancesUI- > >Approach2 > >> > >> Please vote +1 if you agree with this proposed change, or -1 if you > disagree. > >> If you disagree, it would be helpful if you could explain why you > >> believe it would detract from the UI or otherwise be harmful. (Note: > >> While I am not able to make these changes at present, Rüdiger has > >> indicated that he would consider assigning the ticket that addresses > >> this issue, MH-8695, to someone on his team, if this is > >> non-controversial.) > >> > >> best regards, > >> Judy > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Matterhorn mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > >To unsubscribe please email > >[email protected] > >_______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
