I agree with Chris.
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Christopher Brooks wrote: > Ruben, > > I'm afraid I'm still -1 on this. I think the traffic is reasonable > enough and don't want to hive MH into different components each with > their own list. I think just separating it into devs and users is > enough, and encourages us to have a holistic view of the system. > > One of the problems with mailing lists is that you might not be > interested in 100% of the messages. This is unfortunate but > inevitable. > > Chris > >> I'd like to change my #proposal, since it has received a negative >> vote, and creating a separate list for *ALL* capture devices. >> >> It was a suggestion of Tobias and I think it's quite reasonable, >> because (quoting him) we are foreseeing new devices coming in the >> future and such a list would bring vendors and users together, while >> keeping those who don't own a devices from receiving unnecessary mail. >> >> Another argument in favor of this solution is that it's very easy for >> people who is interested in discussions around the devices AND other >> topics to subscribe to different list, while having a single list for >> everything makes more difficult to separate the relevant mail. >> Capture *devices*, in opposition to the official *software* CA, seem >> like a quite specific topic to deserve a list of their own. >> >> Otherwise, I don't see why we keep the "users" and "matterhorn" lists >> separate, since both of them address questions related to Matterhorn, >> people in both lists are "using" Matterhorn (so Matterhorn "users" >> post to the "matterhorn" list too). The borders seem more blurry in >> this case, and however I don't think anybody has anything against >> keeping those list separate. _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
