Hello all,

Have other photo studios/scan labs/R&R departments been wrestling with the 
issue of match prints (or "match prints"), now that most of us are no longer 
sending out transparencies to publishers?

It's one thing to produce a match print on a high-end printer, using color 
management and calibrated everything when you have access to the original 
art or at least to a good transparency.

It's an entirely different proposition to do so when you are assembling 
images for a catalog from a variety of sources, most of whom now simply send 
you a digital file and many of whom do not have the capability of producing 
anything close to a match print. Publishers generally insist on a match 
print, and the lack of an analog resource to compare can certainly cause 
problems in the color proofing process.

When we only have the file to go by, our solution is to produce the best 
print we can, based on what we're seeing on our calibrated monitors and 
using the color profile we receive with the digital file. It's not ideal, 
but the best we can do, considering. One dilemma, though, is what to call 
these prints so that it's clear that they're not truly match prints that 
have a solid relationship to the original art. Or am I just splitting hairs? 
How are others handling this?

Thanks for your input,
Deb Wythe

Deborah Wythe
Head, Digital Collections and Services
Brooklyn Museum
200 Eastern Parkway
Brooklyn, NY 11238
tel: 718 501 6311
fax: 718 501 6145
deborahwythe at hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office 
Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/


Reply via email to