You are on the right track to bring all the files into your color managed
workflow, make any adjustments needed on your monitors and then produce a
guide print for the publisher. 

To many traditional printers, "match print" meant matched to the particular
press, inkset and paper being used.  Today it is really just a guide.

Howard Brainen
Digital Imaging Consultant
TWO CAT DIGITAL INC.
14719 Catalina Street
San Leandro, CA  94577  USA
510-940-2670 x201
www.twocatdigital.com/consulting.html
blog: www.digitalenabler.blogspot.com

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On 
> Behalf Of Deborah Wythe
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:36 AM
> To: mcn-l at mcn.edu
> Subject: [MCN-L] DM SIG: match prints from digital files
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Have other photo studios/scan labs/R&R departments been 
> wrestling with the issue of match prints (or "match prints"), 
> now that most of us are no longer sending out transparencies 
> to publishers?
> 
> It's one thing to produce a match print on a high-end 
> printer, using color management and calibrated everything 
> when you have access to the original art or at least to a 
> good transparency.
> 
> It's an entirely different proposition to do so when you are 
> assembling images for a catalog from a variety of sources, 
> most of whom now simply send you a digital file and many of 
> whom do not have the capability of producing anything close 
> to a match print. Publishers generally insist on a match 
> print, and the lack of an analog resource to compare can 
> certainly cause problems in the color proofing process.
> 
> When we only have the file to go by, our solution is to 
> produce the best print we can, based on what we're seeing on 
> our calibrated monitors and using the color profile we 
> receive with the digital file. It's not ideal, but the best 
> we can do, considering. One dilemma, though, is what to call 
> these prints so that it's clear that they're not truly match 
> prints that have a solid relationship to the original art. Or 
> am I just splitting hairs? 
> How are others handling this?
> 
> Thanks for your input,
> Deb Wythe
> 
> Deborah Wythe
> Head, Digital Collections and Services
> Brooklyn Museum
> 200 Eastern Parkway
> Brooklyn, NY 11238
> tel: 718 501 6311
> fax: 718 501 6145
> deborahwythe at hotmail.com
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from 
> Microsoft Office Live! 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the 
> Museum Computer Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
> 
> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
> 
> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l


Reply via email to