Hi Amalyah,
Although I have found Google groups very easy to set up and manage, I
have no strong opinion on which platform this discussion should be hosted.
My main point here is whether we should keep the discussion in the main
MCN list or on a separate one. The reason for the latter choice would be
to help involving librarians and archivists not directly concerned with
other museum technology topics. Maybe a sub-list within the mcn-l would
be possible?
Given the broad audience who joined this thread only from the MCN list
within a short time, however, I don't think this is a critical issue at
the moment.
Thanks,
Stefano
On 11/18/2015 06:00 AM, mcn-l-requ...@mcn.edu wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:48:06 +0000
From: Amalyah Keshet<akes...@imj.org.il>
To: Museum Computer Network Listserv<mcn-l@mcn.edu>
Subject: Re: [MCN-L] LAM interoperability SIG?
Message-ID:<74af28f834f34dea85a254803d937...@mailsrv2.imj.org.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Stefano:
The MCN listserv is the perfect place to discuss this. That's what it exists
for. Anyone can join, it's open and uncomplicated. Google groups and such are
more complicated (rather a pain, in fact, sometimes), and not everyone has the
time and patience to log into multiple platforms every day. The best, most
highly professional, international discussion groups I (for one) belong to are
all listservs.
Amalyah Keshet
--
Stefano Cossu
Director of Application Services, Collections
The Art Institute of Chicago
116 S. Michigan Ave.
Chicago, IL 60603
312-499-4026
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l@mcn.edu
To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
http://mcn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
The MCN-L archives can be found at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mcn-l@mcn.edu/
