When exactly did Intel solely become responsible for kernel tree? Besides that, why would a MeeGo kernel maintainer team be decided by Intel? Just like everything else, wouldn't it be better making it a proposal for the TSG? Certainly if the MeeGo kernel tree is only maintained by one company this does not fit in with the way MeeGo is suppose to be.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:27:00PM +0200, Carsten Munk wrote: > > I would say that is the MeeGo kernel maintainer team, which may > > include one or more Intel employees, is the people ultimately > > responsible for distribute and maintaining. > > Since when has anyone proposed a "MeeGo kernel maintainer team"? Has > that really happened and been "accepted" by Intel? > > > Which is sane practice. There shouldn't be preferential treatment, > > unless of course the idea is to have the MeeGo kernel maintainer team > > to be just for Intel employees. Or that I've misunderstood something > > and the idea of the MeeGo kernel package is it being a Intel produced > > product. Which doesn't sound right in my ears in a MeeGo context. > > That sounds completly right in a MeeGo context to me :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
