On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:06:40AM +0930, Bradley Smith wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > Um, since when did they not? > > That is obviously a way of avoiding the original question. Where was > any decision made by the community or the TSG that Intel was suppose > to take sole responsibility of the MeeGo kernel?
I'll throw it back the other way, is there any decision made that all packages must go through such a process to determine the owner of them? > > How are things "supposed to be" here? Seriously, have you looked at the > > owners of the packages on the MeeGo system? > > Just in case you haven't noticed, MeeGo intends to be an open project, "intends" :) > maintained openly. I don't understand how you could see that a single > company maintaining the kernel tree and Intel having a veto power > translates into anything open. I'm not disagreeing, just your description seems to not be what is currently happening. Look at the kernel package, the bugs, and who is checking what in. good luck, greg k-h _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
