On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > Um, since when did they not?
That is obviously a way of avoiding the original question. Where was any decision made by the community or the TSG that Intel was suppose to take sole responsibility of the MeeGo kernel? > How are things "supposed to be" here? Seriously, have you looked at the > owners of the packages on the MeeGo system? Just in case you haven't noticed, MeeGo intends to be an open project, maintained openly. I don't understand how you could see that a single company maintaining the kernel tree and Intel having a veto power translates into anything open. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
