Excellent post Carsten; thank you. Carsten Munk wrote: > So, this is primarily an e-mail to ask some questions to the two > members of the TSG, that I think would not be sufficiently covered in > a TSG meeting and answers might be better suited for the e-mail form. > I think there are others who can contribute to the conversation too.
There are systems around meego that are only open to members "for technical reasons" so the discussions around them could be opened up. (Yes, there'll be some frustration at inaccessible links ... but that may help prioritise which systems to allocate "opening-up" resource to. For those involved : Why isn't this happening? What do you need to start discussions on open mailing lists? > We're not working in the open like we're supposed to - even though as > has been said - Intel, Nokia and we all know how to do it! But when > there's a big reveal mentality active, the mode of the people > participating switches to internal/private development, even if you > are only tangentially related to the object/UX being revealed. > > And I think that's the main source of all our so called 'openness' > problems - not malice, conspiracy, laziness or whatever. For the near > future until UX'es are out, the big reveal mentality will have to stay > - and I respect that. I want a blazing start on a good future in this > project with big fanfare. It's the future I'm worried about. It's the credibility of MeeGo as an open project that I'm worried about. > Finally, my questions to the two members of the TSG are: [snip] > Thanks in advance for your answers. I too look forward to the response - nb maybe you should cc/mail them to ensure they don't miss such an important discussion. David -- "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
