On Mon, 17 May 2010 21:22:12 -0600, Robinson Tryon <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...
> > I'm talking about the visual assets - the interaction model and related
> > changes. Everything else I expect to be in the open. Am I not explaining
> > this well? I'm trying really hard here :-)
> 
> The clarification you're providing is great!

Ha! I knew I just had to keep trying. Email can be a very imperfect
medium to convey meaning...

> Well as long as Intel keeps on making cool stuff for MeeGo, I'm sure
> the community will be happy to fold it into the main project!

Somehow that's what I was assuming :-)

> Okay, I think I see the bigger picture here now. Intel wants to work
> independently on UI designs. Every so often, Intel might make an
> announcement with some partners, then do a big code drop into Intel
> repos and ask MeeGo if the project would like to incorporate Intel's
> new UI. Is that about right?

Yep. I ASSUME right now that this will mainly be UI related things - but
just to make sure this isn't misunderstood... I don't know what the
future holds and if there are other potential "big reveal" style things
that might happen. I'm not aware of any - and I don't think we are
planning any (and normally I hope I'd know if we did...)

> > Ok, I keep trying to make my point clear, keep my words straight and
> > crisp. Just like some others before in other threads, let's note that
> > this is not my native language. Please don't do Kreminology on the
> > specific words or terms or phrases that I use - try to understand the
> > sentiment I'm trying to express. And if in doubt - keep asking.
> 
> You've answered all of my questions perfectly well; I dare say that
> your English is quite a bit better than my attempts at speaking or
> writing foreign languages. Thanks for replying!

Thanks for your patience.

/D
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to