On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:08 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > I assume that most companies who have commercial goals around MeeGo are > looking at the UI as one of the main areas of differentiation.
[snip] > What is realy important is to maintain compliance and compatibility > between those different user experiences - that I think is one of the > key objectives of MeeGo. So how far may companies go if the differentiate the UI? What is allowed to still be called Meego or Meego-Compatible? Is it only theming or can they provide their own UI framework? Probably everything has to / should be based on Qt, but having ordinary QtWidget based widgets and having widgets based on QGraphicsView makes a huge difference and you can build almost everything on top of Qt. How will you manage that users always have a consistent look & feel even with 3rd party applications? And how should a developer face this issue - it's surely not a solution to implement every 3rd party application for every vendor specific UI framework. Too many questions, I know :) Conny _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
