On May 19, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Quim Gil wrote:
>> Ibrahim from The Linux Foundation is driving the MeeGo compliance
>> definition. Hopefully we can have a first version of the guidelines
>> published soon, currently under private drafting and review to sync
>> legal, technical, marketing and resourcing aspects.
>
> This is the kind of thing I think could benefit enormously from being
> written & revised in the MeeGo wiki. It's of vital importance to all
> contributors, and yet only a privileged few will see anything but a
> finished product/fait accompli.
Well said. I might add that it is imperative that the compliance path be fully
communicated - otherwise being compliant will be nigh on impossible.
>
> In fact, I think that the community as a whole would benefit from being
> exposed to (and forced to take into consideration) the legal, technical,
> marketing & resourcing aspects of compliance, since I'm sure that these
> are not things most people think about at all :)
Spot on Dave.
>
> Ibrahim, is it possible for you to publish whatever draft you have now,
> even if it's protected for writing, and integrate any comments &
> feeedback into the page as you get them? Or, perhaps, prepare a draft
> for review by legal here, based on what you have now, to avoid excessive
> to-and-froing?
Do we know if Ibrahim received this request? I don't see his reply to the list.
Jeremiah
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
