On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:32 +0200, ext Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 8/4/2010 4:29 AM, Ameya Palande wrote: > > Skipping review check for what goes inside config-generic is not > > acceptable since it is also used by ARM. > > > > nobody is hiding what goes into config-generic, and additions get put at > the end...
Problem is not about hiding stuff. When I get to see the stuff, it is already committed! > so why don't you do your review based on what is there, rather than > blocking progress instead? I am not blocking the progress. I am not happy with the current process of putting stuff into config-generic without getting it reviewed. So I proposed to get it reviewed. > and yes if you add a patch to the arm section of the kernel that adds a > config option, I expect you to update config-generic as well. Agreed. > I know you've not done that consistently so far, and so far I've usually > fixed up after you.... I have already Thanked you for doing that, but thanks again for fixing it :) Cheers, Ameya. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
