Hi

How much efforts are required for n900 voice feature work for 0.9.22?  How long 
could you get it happen?

Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zhu, Peter J
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 11:05 AM
> To: Carsten Munk; Clark, Joel
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 16012 accepted:
> Trunk:Testing/pulseaudio
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Munk
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:59 AM
> > To: Clark, Joel
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 16012 accepted:
> > Trunk:Testing/pulseaudio
> >
> > 2011/4/11 Clark, Joel <[email protected]>:
> > > PA22 is required to fix Bluetooth HFP support for IVI, which was broken 
> > > and
> > never fixed when MeeGo moved from PA 0.21 to PA 0.19. One could argue PA
> > 0.19 should never have been allowed in Trunk.
> >
> > Right, we can argue for a while about this, but let's get down to business.
> >
> > The problem was that this change came out of the blue while 0.19
> > downgrade was actually discussed and announced on the mailing lists in
> > December so it could be done without breaking anything. I don't recall
> > seeing any bug registered with Bluetooth HFP back then (but feel free
> > to prove me wrong). Needless to say that no-one should enter
> > regressions that breaks any platform or vertical (not us N900 guys,
> > not anyone from Intel or anyone else)  - MeeGo Core has to work for
> > everyone.
> >
> > The excuse that people have deadlines for the IVI and Handset side to
> > break Core isn't valid as well, N900 team has deadlines too. MeeGo
> > Core was announced to be frozen, too, so this PA upgrade was a bit
> > surprising.
> >
> > We -really- need to have a release engineering team that is fully
> > independent from company pressures - process should be valid for
> > everyone or we'll miss release targets and vendors will be pissed at
> > us for not being reliable to build products on as we can't even follow
> > our own timelines and rules.
> >
> > Now, on to the technical part - we want to have working cellular audio
> > on N900 for 1.2 too.
> >
> > Any objections for us to add the support for ALSA 'old sinks' to
> > PulseAudio? Same patches were used in PA 0.9.21 for MeeGo 1.1 and
> > didn't break things for any verticals, to my knowledge.
> >
> NO objections. Please work on this and get it work for 0.9.22
> 
> Peter.
> 
> > BR
> > Carsten Munk
> >
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Joel
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sami Sirkiä
> > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:22 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 16012 accepted:
> > Trunk:Testing/pulseaudio
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > It seems that the pulseaudio 0.9.22 in T:T does not provide
> > > module-alsa-sink-old.so or module-alsa-source-old.so. N900
> > > pa-configuration needs them. This does not show up as build failure.
> > >
> > > This breaks cellular audio on N900.
> > > MIC refuses to create T:T images now. (so it breaks everything)
> > >
> > > I am not sure, but I think the only way to fix it, is to add support for
> > > old-sink/-source  to the pulseaudio.
> > > I don't remember how big of a task that is or if that creates other
> > > problems.
> > > One thing I do remember is that resource policy had issues with pa.21 -
> > > this was the reason pa.19 was used in the first place. I hope someone
> > > has addressed these issues - I don't know about such work.
> > >
> > >
> > > I got the pulseaudio-modules-n900 to build, but testing them is going to
> > > be hard, it not impossible with current pa.22.
> > >
> >
> http://build.meego.com/package/show?package=pulseaudio-modules-n900&p
> > roject=home%3Asami.sirkia%3Abranches%3Adevel%3Amultimedia
> > >
> > > That's just some patches copied/modified from pa-modules-mfld to get it
> > > building. No cleanup has been done.
> > >
> > > Do not let pa22 into trunk.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > SSirkia
> > >
> > > On 04/11/2011 11:25 AM, Zhang, Vivian wrote:
> > >> Sorry that I didn't notice the pulseaudio-modules-n900 build failure 
> > >> earlier.
> > The new PA is just in devel:multimedia last Friday and we should check in it
> > ASAP to meet the schedule of Tablet and IVI verticals.
> > >> Could you make the fixing for the build failure? It will help a lot. 
> > >> Anything I
> > can help, please let me know.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> vivian
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Marko Saukko [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:46 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Cc: Zhang, Vivian; [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: [meego-commits] 16012 accepted: Trunk:Testing/pulseaudio
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Could someone please revert this request, because it causes
> > >> pulseaudio-modules-n900 to fail.
> > >>
> > >> pulseaudio-modules-n900 fails in devel:multimedia already so this
> > >> request should not have been even sent yet.
> > >>
> > >> Ps. Where was it decided that pulseaudio is going to be updated to
> > >> 0.9.22? Could someone sent a link to ML where this was
> > >> suggested/decided/announced with the schedule when this was going to
> > >> happen, i.e., where N900 adaptation team could have read this
> > information?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Marko
> > >>
> > >> On 04/11/2011 08:57 AM, Peter Zhu wrote:
> > >>> Hi Vivian Zhang,
> > >>> The following change has been accepted. See the changelog below.
> > >>>
> > >>> Comments:
> > >>>       Thank you
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> MeeGo Release Engineering Team
> > >>>
> > >>> [This message was auto-generated]
> > >>> ---
> > >>>
> > >>> Request #16012:
> > >>>
> > >>>     submit:   devel:multimedia/pulseaudio(r51)
> > ->   Trunk:Testing/pulseaudio
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Message:
> > >>>       Upgrade to 0.9.22; Synced with latest development tree in
> > pulseaudio.org and merged necessary mfld patches (BMC #15688)
> > >>>
> > >>> State:   accepted     2011-04-10T22:57:28 peter
> > >>> Comment: Thank you
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> History: new          2011-04-10T19:09:22 vivian
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> MeeGo-commits mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-commits
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging

Reply via email to