Best Regards,
Yanshuang
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andre Klapper [mailto:aklap...@openismus.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 3:21 PM
> To: Zheng, Yanshuang
> Cc: meego...@meego.com
> Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] "Triaged By" field?
>
> Hi Yanshuang, so can you please answer my questions, especially where
> exactly the introduction of the field "Triaged by" was exactly
> discussed?
>
> andre
>
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:12 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Hi Yanshuang,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:45 +0800, Zheng, Yanshuang wrote:
> > > thanks for the link. So the only reference I find on the wikipage is
> > > the sentence "The one who debugs it can take credits by typing his/her
> > > account on “Triaged by” field."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yanshuang: Yeah, it explains. We need a field to track who did the
> > > system debug, not only appreciate his/her contribution, but also for
> > > further discussion with him/her and some statistics.
> >
> > Why exactly is the History (show_activity.cgi) plus a free form comment
> > (which is needed ANYWAY, as the results of complex triaging and
> > reassigning need to be elaborated) not sufficient enough?
> >
[Yanshuang] To record and filter someone who took the credits of debug. This is
also the way we encourage community to contribute on sysdebug.
> > > So whose idea was this, where was this idea discussed, how was it
> > > decided to add this field?
> > >
> > > Yanshuang: I thought we have discussed about keyword "need-triage" in
> > > this mail list, and that's why we now have those as you saw at
> > > http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/SysDebug.
> >
> > Yes, we discussed the keyword. But my question was about where exactly
> > the introduction of the field "Triaged by" was exactly discussed.
> >
[Yanshuang] When we discussed about keyword "need-triage" in QA list, we also
mentioned how to involve all meego community users.
Further revision about sysdebug were discussed among related stakeholders
through internal mails or meetings. I don't think *ALL* decisions needs to be
made in public ways.
To get all community learned this, we document it in a wiki page, where I think
well explained why we have "triaged by".
It is true that "triaged by" is not a perfect string. We need practice and any
suggestion/enhancement is welcome.
However, simply remove it is not a friend way, especially when it has been used
by a bunch of engineers.
It does not mean 'useless' simply because someone does not use it.
> > > I prefer a "Keep it simple and stupid" approach, but I see an ever
> > > increasing amount of new fields and flags added to show_bug.cgi
> > > without any discussion about its usefulness (but maybe I miss the
> > > places where these discussions take place?).
> > >
> > > Yanshuang: I like "Keep it simple and stupid" too, but thing is not
> > > always perfect as our project goes larger and further...
> >
> > I have problems to spot an actual argumentation in that sentence. :)
> >
> > So how exactly do you plan to avoid an ever increasing Bugzilla
> > interface complexity due to "our project goes larger and
> > further" (whatever that phrase actually means, plus it applies to ANY
> > random software project out there anyway, so it's meaningless)?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for explaining.
> >
> > andre
> >
>
> --
> Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)
> http://www.openismus.com
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-qa mailing list
MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
