Hi, Once again there has been mentioned "need-triage" keyword.
>> > Yanshuang: I thought we have discussed about keyword "need-triage" >in >> > this mail list, and that's why we now have those as you saw at >> > http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/SysDebug. I agree with need of the keyword, but that one isn't in the keyword list. Also, I can't find documentation of the usage for it. Is there any? What comes to Triaged By - field, I don't find it useful. Br, Iekku >-----Original Message----- >From: meego-qa-boun...@lists.meego.com [mailto:meego-qa- >boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Andre Klapper >Sent: 30 May, 2011 10:21 >To: Zheng, Yanshuang >Cc: meego...@meego.com >Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] "Triaged By" field? > >Hi Yanshuang, so can you please answer my questions, especially where >exactly the introduction of the field "Triaged by" was exactly >discussed? > >andre > > >On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:12 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: >> Hi Yanshuang, >> >> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:45 +0800, Zheng, Yanshuang wrote: >> > thanks for the link. So the only reference I find on the wikipage is >> > the sentence "The one who debugs it can take credits by typing >his/her >> > account on “Triaged by” field." >> > >> > >> > >> > Yanshuang: Yeah, it explains. We need a field to track who did the >> > system debug, not only appreciate his/her contribution, but also for >> > further discussion with him/her and some statistics. >> >> Why exactly is the History (show_activity.cgi) plus a free form >comment >> (which is needed ANYWAY, as the results of complex triaging and >> reassigning need to be elaborated) not sufficient enough? >> >> > So whose idea was this, where was this idea discussed, how was it >> > decided to add this field? >> > >> > Yanshuang: I thought we have discussed about keyword "need-triage" >in >> > this mail list, and that's why we now have those as you saw at >> > http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/SysDebug. >> >> Yes, we discussed the keyword. But my question was about where exactly >> the introduction of the field "Triaged by" was exactly discussed. >> >> > I prefer a "Keep it simple and stupid" approach, but I see an ever >> > increasing amount of new fields and flags added to show_bug.cgi >> > without any discussion about its usefulness (but maybe I miss the >> > places where these discussions take place?). >> > >> > Yanshuang: I like "Keep it simple and stupid" too, but thing is not >> > always perfect as our project goes larger and further... >> >> I have problems to spot an actual argumentation in that sentence. :) >> >> So how exactly do you plan to avoid an ever increasing Bugzilla >> interface complexity due to "our project goes larger and >> further" (whatever that phrase actually means, plus it applies to ANY >> random software project out there anyway, so it's meaningless)? >> >> Thanks in advance for explaining. >> >> andre >> > >-- >Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) >http://www.openismus.com > >_______________________________________________ >MeeGo-qa mailing list >MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com >http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa _______________________________________________ MeeGo-qa mailing list MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
