But the E15ET is E-W? For the 120Y you need a N-S motor?

Tom pretty much explained it. Another advantage of blow through is PSsshhhhh! 
though I am not installing one just yet. If you have any more questions about 
blow through I *should* be able to answer them! :)

Blow through is much more expensive, but I'm hoping it has good advantages over 
suck through. I've only ever seen one blow through L-series 1600 however I've 
seen probably over 10 suck through L series 1600. I think your choice comes 
down to the cost/difficulty. In my case I was lucky to pick up the blow through 
kit.

zac


> Blow thru, thats the word i was looking for :)
> 
> Yeh EFI, would be nice but this is for a A12 motor and spending as little $$$ 
as
> possible is the idea..  I have put off installing a turbo on my Astra (N12 E15
> engine) for exactly that reason, because im trying to nut out programming an
> engine mgmt system for the E15ET manifold I have..
> 
> Still considering a 120y with E15ET engine, that should be an interesting
> project..
> 
> - Julian
> 
> Tom Richardson wrote:
> 
> > Julian,
> >
> > One word: Intercooling
> >
> > With a blow through turbo (like zac's setup) you can cool the air charge
> > before it mixes with fuel in the carby, with a suck through setup (like
> > paddy's setup) you would have to cool a fuel/air charge- not a great idea!
> > There are plenty of suck through turbo cars around though so they obviously
> > work, one advantage is that you get a nicely mixed fuel/air charge I
> > suppose.
> >
> > But yea, suck through turbo's are much easier to do, because you just treat
> > the carby(s) like on a thirsty N/A motor.  No pressurised fuel bowls, no
> > high pressure fuel (you need boost pressure + ~5psi available for blow
> > through) so you can use the standard pump and lines.
> >
> > Then again, intercooling may not be such a big draw card if you only want to
> > run low boost and don't have problems with detonation.  As always, depends
> > on how much power you're chasing
> >
> > - Tom
> >
> > PS, Remember (to quote Bill Kenyon from the Bluebirds list) that there are
> > two kinds of 510's, those that have EFI, and those that need it :)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Julian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "OZDAT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Suck thru vs Draw thru turbos
> >
> > > I was wondering about the advantages and disavantages of running these
> > > different types of setup.
> > >
> > > Firstly i understand a suck thru setup is similar to Paddy's L16 where
> > > the carb is before the turbo.  Draw thru is after the turbo?  right?
> > >
> > > Anyway as i can see suck thru is easier to setup, you could use existing
> > > fuel regulators and pumps (as long as they supply the greater demand for
> > > fuel).  The thing im curious with is running fuel through the hot
> > > turbo.  I take it this is ok because obviously its been done before and
> > > proved to work but i still sceptical
> > >
> > > With Draw thru you might not be able to use the existing carby, and if
> > > you can it raises some sealing problems with the higher pressure fuel
> > > you need to run to overcome the boost pressure.  This also needs a high
> > > pressure fuel pump and rising regulator plus a surge tank.
> > >
> > > As i see it suck thru is heaps easier and cheaper...  so what is the
> > > disadvantage im not seeing??
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > - Julian
> > >
> >
> 
> 


Reply via email to