Hi Richard, Ive been thinking, maybe even the Aust built early shells were treated to better manufacturing, because my Aust built 69 was in FAR better condition than it should have been, and it wasnt because it had led a sheltered life. Perhaps the early Aust cars were built using imported panels/metal or something, like a big kit??
Andrew On Sat, 4 May 2002, Richard Clough wrote: > BlankMark No difference, unless yours is "Made in Japan" - check the > build plate on the LH strut tower - bottom line. If its Oz built, its > the same as a 70- 72, if its Japanese its a better body shell, as they > are less prone to rust because they have better panel plating and seam > sealing > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mark O'Conner > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 7:58 AM > Subject: 1969 1600 > > > Can anyone tell me, Why is it that the common 1600's being built by people are > 1971 - 72 models? > > I have a 1969 model - are their any inherent problems in this model that were >later eliminated that I should need to know about? > > Sorry for the history lesson! > > Mark > > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- > OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- > Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > No unauthorised redistribution of this email > http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm > http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
