<<...queen hillary holds the record for production...>>

I don't know how you can say that; she hardly says anything these days.
Rather than speak and expose her statements to the analysis of (the few
remaining) critical thinkers, she prefers to run on her record...or at least
her plumbing structure.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of G Mann
via Mercedes
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:05 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Cc: G Mann
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Compressed air storage

I hate to poke a hole in your new found love of compressed air, but.......

queen hillary holds the record for production, now if we can just find a
storage facility... Ft. Leavenworth Federal should work nicely...

Gotta run.. I'm late for the shareholders meeting for Uranium Mines...

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> The Republican "debates", including the Plan B debacle for junior 
> varsity (not-ready-for-prime-time) candidates, would be a great way to 
> test that concept.  The hot air emanating from these bloviators would 
> generate awesome pressure and take forever to cool.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, fmiser via Mercedes < 
> mercedes@okiebenz.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Andrew wrote:
> > >
> > > I used to think this was an elaborate hoax.  Now I am leading in 
> > > the other direction (non-hoax).
> >
> > > Canadian-based company NRStor Inc. set its sights on solving the 
> > > complicated and critical problem of energy storage with technology 
> > > that would compress air and store it in salt caverns to backup the 
> > > grid when the wind isn't blowing.
> >
> > Interesting idea.
> >
> > I think if there is a hill that pumping water to the top will 
> > probably have less losses.  One issue with compressed gas is the act 
> > of compressing it makes it hot, and for long term storage that heat 
> > will be lost.  The greater the pressure, the greater the heat and 
> > the greater the loss.
> >
> > If they have figured out a way to effectively use low-pressure air 
> > to generate electricity, it might work out really good.  But if it's 
> > just a turbine, high pressure makes the turbine more effective, so 
> > there will be a compromise either way.
> >
> > Short term storage - as in day vs night - the heat could be retained 
> > and then the system looks pretty good.  Except for the explosion 
> > dangers.
> >
> > --  Philip, speaking before reading up on the details
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to