My wife was asking about the classified email stuff over the weekend. I
pointed out that when I had a security clearance (only SECRET not SI/TK)
had I done anything remotely close to what she has done -- brought home
classified info, emailed info, left info in an unsecured area, copied it
to unsecured media -- I would be in some federal prison somewhere,
house, cars, bank account, everything would be gone. And yet here we
have a person, who could not have been doing the job correctly without
the transmission of large amounts of classified info, day in day out,
admitting to having broken the law (no matter the parsing of words). It
is just plainly apparent that this stuff is some very serious criminal
behavior. And it is highly likely that all this information has fallen
into the hands of the bad guys, which is treasonous behavior.
I can't stand the woman, but none of that behavior has nothing to do
with any political view. It is just practical application of the law
that applies to anyone with a security clearance and access to
classified info. If some low-level staffer in the comms section had
been doing this, that person would be bunking with "Chelsea" Manning at
Club Fed right now. I can understand the politics involved here, but
that woman should be sitting in a prison cell right now.
--R
On 8/30/15 11:16 AM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
If anyone other than Hillary had the same history of criminal involvement
in an organized criminal enterprise over the past 40 plus years, all assets
would be seized and RICO charges would be brought, trial would be held, and
imprisonment would follow, for the maximum allowed by law.
Both Bill and Hillary are a text book example of misusing the power of
public office to manipulate, enrich themselves, control, and abuse power
and trust.
Only laying blame on their personal abuse of office, not any political
party affiliation, and only looking at the facts, not speculation, logical
conclusion can be made that ample evidence of a long standing criminal
enterprise has been operated by them working in concert with others.
Politics be damned, holding the vessel of public office does not give free
pass to violate laws.
This video is now on youtube, it runs 1:33 and while long, covers some of
the back story of the Clintons. It has first party interviews [many] with
people who observed illegal activity or participated in illegal activity
with or at the direction of Clintons. If you watch it, draw your own
conclusions.
https://youtu.be/C8B43JOshC4
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Max Dillon via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
Craig,
The last line of the story has the sign owner speculating that Republicans
may be stealing the signs. I have my doubts about that.
I would consider buying a bumper snicker with his design!
--
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
'87 300TD
'95 E300
On August 30, 2015 10:42:28 AM EDT, Craig via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
Your title is confused, Max. It's the democrats who are stealing the
signs because they don't like what they say.
Craig
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
