> I do have to suggest that those "studies" about prevented crimes use
> numbers that were pulled from their asses.
They would have to. How do you definitively count a negative? Estimations
and anecdotes. Still, as fecally-tainted as such numbers must necessarily
be, they've got to be _far_ more accurate than the zero that the grabbers
would have you believe.
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: