On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> >...minimize possible cache hits on cacheless Celeron chips...
>
> Isn't that a vacuous statement? :-)
>
> (Say, I never heard of any cacheless Celeron chips, or any other
> cacheless chip since the late eighties...)
Eh? All the original Celeron chips were sans cache, only after
the customers started screaming about a 300 performing like a 200mhz
pentium did the 300A and later come out with a reduced size cache (instead
of none).
----
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches,
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
--About the Internet and nuclear war.
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
