Thomas Hellström wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
This seems to be:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5873
Which says:
-----
You need glxproto.h from the X.Org proto/GL CVS module to build
current Mesa CVS.
-----
I'm not personally much of an expert regarding these things... It
does seem like we've ended up with some odd interdependencies between
projects.
Keith
Indeed. Mesa CVS won't build without files from Xorg CVS, and Xorg CVS
doesn't build because of updates to Mesa shader 48 hrs ago.
Shouldn't Mesa be able to build as a standalone glx-capable libGL?
Also, Xorg should define and document a Mesa version to build against.
Commiting new files to Mesa breaks Xorg building. Currently the Xorg
modular wiki page says Mesa CVS is needed to build Xorg CVS.
It seems to me that whatever reason Xorg needs to build mesa for (I'm
guessing the indirect GLX software rasterizer) is a mistake.
If mesa is to be built, it should be built within the tree it is
developed. That might mean that Mesa should learn how to build itself
in a form suitable for use as X.org's internal rasterizer, or better
still now that we have AIGLX approaching, that Mesa grows a DRI
software-only rasterizer that Xorg can use when a hardware driver for
AIGLX isn't available.
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
