Brian Paul wrote: > Coincidentally, I was working on that code today. I'll check in some > changes later today.
That seems to have fixed the assertion failure, thanks. However the depth peeling computation still causes some tests to fail. They pass on all other machines which are not using development mesa (and thus either do not use mesa at all or use a mesa that does not report support for depth peeling so alpha blending is used instead). Perhaps you'll be able to identify the problem just from the images: http://www.vtk.org/Testing/Sites/hythloth.kitware/Linux-gcc33/20070413-0300-Nightly/Results/__Rendering_Testing_Cxx_TestOpacity.html http://www.vtk.org/Testing/Sites/hythloth.kitware/Linux-gcc33/20070413-0300-Nightly/Results/__Rendering_Testing_Tcl_TestOpacity2-image.html There are also a few other problems with development mesa I haven't fully tracked down yet. The full set of failing VTK tests is here: http://www.vtk.org/Testing/Sites/hythloth.kitware/Linux-gcc33/20070413-0300-Nightly/Test.html The "OTHER_FAULT" ones are due to other mesa assertion failures. The SEGFAULT ones seem to have some kind of memory corruption caused by mesa. These failures started with changes from Feb 2 to Feb 4 in mesa. If you need more information let me know. Thanks, -Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
