2008/8/20 Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What I'd probably do then is create a mesa-7.2 branch, based on 7.1, > which will be a stable, bug-fix branch without GEM. > > Then, designate mesa/master as the new-feature / GEM / 7.3 development > area. I'd also consider merging gallium-0.1 into master into that.
Not that I'd know anything about anything, but from user point of view 7.0 branch has seen quite a lot of updates and fixes for a stable branch, including Intel GLSL support, ATI fixes etc. The only possibly big thing (besides code restructuring etc) in 7.1 release notes is GL_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, which might be not too useful before GEM etc. is also there. So, is there a point of having a stable 7.2 with not so many user-visible improvements (I might have missed some big ones), while GEM is quite likely actually being deployed for eg. Fedora 10, in other words stabilized? So I'd say 7.2 with GEM, 7.3 with gallium, but you probably know better. -Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
