Stephane Marchesin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Brian Paul
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:23:06 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks like dri_bufmgr.h/intel_bufmgr.h are missing in the
>>>>> tarball. Could this be?
>>>>>
>>>> See my other reply on mesa3d-dev, they're from libdrm git master.
>>> So I see a couple of ways to resolve this,
>>>
>>> 1) Back out GEM, release 7.1, put GEM back in - preferred by me.
>> That occured to me too and I think I prefer it as well.
>>
>> What I'd probably do then is create a mesa-7.2 branch, based on 7.1,
>> which will be a stable, bug-fix branch without GEM.
>>
>> Then, designate mesa/master as the new-feature / GEM / 7.3 development
>> area.  I'd also consider merging gallium-0.1 into master into that.
>>
> 
> Talking about merging, I'm thinking the nouveau/gallium efforts could
> be merged in as well at that point. What do you think ?

Yeah, I'd be fine with that.

-Brian


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to