Stephane Marchesin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Brian Paul > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dave Airlie wrote: >>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:23:06 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Looks like dri_bufmgr.h/intel_bufmgr.h are missing in the >>>>> tarball. Could this be? >>>>> >>>> See my other reply on mesa3d-dev, they're from libdrm git master. >>> So I see a couple of ways to resolve this, >>> >>> 1) Back out GEM, release 7.1, put GEM back in - preferred by me. >> That occured to me too and I think I prefer it as well. >> >> What I'd probably do then is create a mesa-7.2 branch, based on 7.1, >> which will be a stable, bug-fix branch without GEM. >> >> Then, designate mesa/master as the new-feature / GEM / 7.3 development >> area. I'd also consider merging gallium-0.1 into master into that. >> > > Talking about merging, I'm thinking the nouveau/gallium efforts could > be merged in as well at that point. What do you think ?
Yeah, I'd be fine with that. -Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev