On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 18:20 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:23:06 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > >> > >>> Looks like dri_bufmgr.h/intel_bufmgr.h are missing in the > >>> tarball. Could this be? > >>> > >> See my other reply on mesa3d-dev, they're from libdrm git master. > > > > So I see a couple of ways to resolve this, > > > > 1) Back out GEM, release 7.1, put GEM back in - preferred by me. > > That occured to me too and I think I prefer it as well. > > What I'd probably do then is create a mesa-7.2 branch, based on 7.1, > which will be a stable, bug-fix branch without GEM.
Sorry. When I did the merge, someone had told me that 7.1 had already been branched, and I didn't check before the merge. I agree, for 7.1 it should be without GEM. Could you just cut the branchpoint before my merge? If I've caused too much pain and you want everything that's happened in master except for GEM on the branch, I could do that work for you (just say so). Our plan for our quarterly release is to take whatever is the most 7.1-ish and include GEM on top of that. But the timeframe for that is the next couple of months, not the next couple of days. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
