This awesome! Any particular reason for choosing GPLv3 instead of MIT? Perhaps 
picking the latter would just make it easier to get it integrated into meta-ros 
(which is licensed as MIT, much like OpenEmbedded's core recipes). Also, given 
that these are build recipes, maybe there's not much of benefit in using GPLv3.

Thanks Victor (and Erle)!





---
[Visit 
Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/2) 
or reply to this email to respond.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [click 
here](https://discourse.ros.org/email/unsubscribe/baa0146a3b445ec741b38987385b7e98da439f0dd3695e9148a7393240cc9867).
  • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Lukas Bulwahn' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux

Reply via email to