Thanks for your honest response and for considering whether to change or not 
the license. I don't think there's anything wrong with GPLv3 per se, but given 
that most OpenEmbedded layers (meta-beagleboard, openembedded-core, 
meta-96boards, etc.) have very liberal licenses (MIT/X11, BSD) I wondered if 
there was an actual reason for picking GPLv3.





---
[Visit 
Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/4) 
or reply to this email to respond.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [click 
here](https://discourse.ros.org/email/unsubscribe/99e7c841715435c810b7dfad5057fbf8197bfc209840ce1b91c246145811b014).
  • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Lukas Bulwahn' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux

Reply via email to